Post by account_disabled on Feb 27, 2024 4:49:52 GMT -5
The it is a good term. Limitations Unfortunately this method fell victim to the same disambiguation problem that CPC presents. Because Google groups terms together it is possible that on some occasions two tags will be given the same metrics. For example pontoons boat pontoonboat pontoon boats pontoon boat pontoon boating and pontoons boats were in the same traffic volume group which also included tags like yacht and yachts. Moreover there is no accounting for keyword difficulty in this metric. Some tags when combined with product types produce keywords that receive substantial traffic but will always be out of reach for a templated tag page.
Unique visitors Method This method was a nobrainer Kazakhstan Phone Number protect the tags that already receive traffic from Google. We exported all of the tags from Google Analytics that had received search traffic from . Generally speaking this should be a fairly safe list of terms. Benefits When doing experimental work with a client it is always nice to be able to give them a scenario that almost guarantees improvement. Because we were able to protect tags that already receive traffic by labeling them as good in the vast majority of cases we could ensure that the client had a high probability of profiting from the changes we made and minimal risk of any traffic loss. Limitations Unfortunately even this method wasnt perfect.
If a product or set of products with high enough authority included a poor variation of a tag then the bad variant would rank and receive traffic. We had to use other strategies to verify our selections from this method and devise a method to encourage a tag swap in the index for the correct version of a term. Tag count Description The frequency with which a tag was used on the site was often a strong signal that we could trust the tag especially when compared with other similar tags. By counting the number of times.
Unique visitors Method This method was a nobrainer Kazakhstan Phone Number protect the tags that already receive traffic from Google. We exported all of the tags from Google Analytics that had received search traffic from . Generally speaking this should be a fairly safe list of terms. Benefits When doing experimental work with a client it is always nice to be able to give them a scenario that almost guarantees improvement. Because we were able to protect tags that already receive traffic by labeling them as good in the vast majority of cases we could ensure that the client had a high probability of profiting from the changes we made and minimal risk of any traffic loss. Limitations Unfortunately even this method wasnt perfect.
If a product or set of products with high enough authority included a poor variation of a tag then the bad variant would rank and receive traffic. We had to use other strategies to verify our selections from this method and devise a method to encourage a tag swap in the index for the correct version of a term. Tag count Description The frequency with which a tag was used on the site was often a strong signal that we could trust the tag especially when compared with other similar tags. By counting the number of times.