Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2015 14:26:58 GMT -5
The Eagles actually went to Foxborough and won.. Personally wasn't all that impressed. Can't seem to get the idea out of my head that due to Brady's targets going down, that this game ended up differently than imagined. Well there's the balance in all that. You're your own boss at your own apartment, but you have to pay for stuff. Car payment, housing payment, groceries, gas, etc. ... I'm 17 years old, and thinking about what I want to do for college next year, so it helps I have some people who've been in that position, and know what worked/didn't for them. I had my own apartment from May - October and it sucked but mainly because my roommate was a huge idiot See, that's the thing. If I ever got an apartment, 9 times out of 10, I'd want it on my own. I could invite friends over when I liked to, but I'd want to be on my lonesome. Most of my friends are younger than 2-3 years younger than me anyway, so it's not like we'd both be in community college and both be needing an apartment close to campus. But here, if you go to a college, you have to live in a dorm with a classmate for at least one year. Right now, looking at community college for a couple years, and then transferring out, but that could change if I got a full-ride somewhere.
|
|
|
Post by Professor Berch on Dec 7, 2015 15:53:29 GMT -5
(First, I was able to see the whole game) My apartment is more so school housing for a small school that doesn't have dorms. I have three roommates and go back home most weekends. Otherwise, it is pretty nice. And I'm online all day Sunday monitoring my fantasy team. The Eagles actually went to Foxborough and won.. Personally wasn't all that impressed. Can't seem to get the idea out of my head that due to Brady's targets going down, that this game ended up differently than imagined. No doubt, just having Gronk in the game, the Pats woulda won. Or just Edelman. But the Pats have always been able to win no matter who was playing. They won with Matt Cassel at QB! No other team has been able to do that. So to be able to beat the Pats in Foxborough, especially with Brady at QB, is a huge thing, even without his top weapons.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2015 16:13:36 GMT -5
The Eagles actually went to Foxborough and won.. Personally wasn't all that impressed. Can't seem to get the idea out of my head that due to Brady's targets going down, that this game ended up differently than imagined. No doubt, just having Gronk in the game, the Pats woulda won. Or just Edelman. But the Pats have always been able to win no matter who was playing. They won with Matt Cassel at QB! No other team has been able to do that. So to be able to beat the Pats in Foxborough, especially with Brady at QB, is a huge thing, even without his top weapons. I'm not saying Tom Brady's awful, but he looked lost without his weapons. He's had to go through so much turmoil with everyone on the offense changing, seemingly, every other year. It just stinks when nobody's running the right routes, and we saw chemistry plays a huge factor in winning games in the National Football League. Brady and the receivers he played with yesterday? Little to no chemistry.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2015 18:22:02 GMT -5
More surprising cut? Cary Williams (Seattle) or Miles Austin (Philadelphia)
|
|
|
Post by Professor Berch on Dec 7, 2015 18:58:47 GMT -5
More surprising cut? Cary Williams (Seattle) or Miles Austin (Philadelphia) Neither. Cary Williams is shit and Miles Austin dropped so many passes that he should have caught. They each cost their teams games.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2015 19:37:31 GMT -5
More surprising cut? Cary Williams (Seattle) or Miles Austin (Philadelphia) Neither. Cary Williams is shit and Miles Austin dropped so many passes that he should have caught. They each cost their teams games. Personally feel Cary is more shocking. The least I thought is he'd be demoted down the depth chart, but to be completely released midseason?? It's odd to me!
|
|
|
Post by Professor Berch on Dec 7, 2015 21:28:44 GMT -5
Neither. Cary Williams is shit and Miles Austin dropped so many passes that he should have caught. They each cost their teams games. Personally feel Cary is more shocking. The least I thought is he'd be demoted down the depth chart, but to be completely released midseason?? It's odd to me! He's getting old and he gets burned by #2 receivers constantly, sometimes #3 receivers. With that big a contract, letting go was the right choice. Either pay someone a lot of money to sit on the bench, or give them some money, have them not be on your team, and have someone who will potentially play better for less money.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2015 1:20:09 GMT -5
Dallas beats the Redskins in DC, 19-16 in a game of field goals and an exhilarating 2 minutes! This was the only sure game left on the Cowboys schedule without Tony Romo, having that extra rest and getting a Redskins team on a high versus the Giants. It was easy pickings. The Cowboys now have: at Green Bay New York Jets on Saturday night at Buffalo Washington back in Dallas Those are all losses, with the slight chance of beating the Jets and Redskins, in which I actually think the Redskins could split the season series with us. Let's get things straight (even if I'm the only Dallas fan on RWF).... The Cowboys won't be winning this division, and honestly wouldn't mind them losing out, because they're definitely not playing in a Super Bowl this year.. The only reason I'd like for the Cowboys to do the unthinkable and win the division, is that'd assure that none of the others have a chance. But honestly, just so glad and relieved the Cowboys won this game. Had made a bet with a Redskins fan (since it was his birthday) if the Cowboys lost, I'd wear the burgundy and gold on Wednesday night.... I'M FREE!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2015 11:40:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Jigsaw on Dec 8, 2015 12:52:53 GMT -5
DeMarco is a fantastic RB who excels at down hill running. He just hasnt been able to find the holes when moving east and west like he did when going north and south.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2015 13:11:09 GMT -5
DeMarco is a fantastic RB who excels at down hill running. He just hasnt been able to find the holes when moving east and west like he did when going north and south. Do you think he's just not a fit inside Chip Kelly's scheme, where he's in Shotgun rather than the I-Form?
|
|
|
Post by Professor Berch on Dec 8, 2015 14:18:37 GMT -5
DeMarco just isn't what Chip Kelly wants in a runner. What Chip wants is someone who can run east/west, and DeMarco isn't comfortable with that. I feel like, after the season, we'll trade him for something. My brother seems to think he has no value, but he is still one of the better runners. We could get something for him. But what we need is Mathews as the #1, DeMarco as the #2 and Sproles as #3.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2015 14:22:40 GMT -5
DeMarco just isn't what Chip Kelly wants in a runner. What Chip wants is someone who can run east/west, and DeMarco isn't comfortable with that. I feel like, after the season, we'll trade him for something. My brother seems to think he has no value, but he is still one of the better runners. We could get something for him. But what we need is Mathews as the #1, DeMarco as the #2 and Sproles as #3. Would you have still done the LeSean McCoy for Kiko Alonso deal, looking back? Then if you kept McCoy, that would obviously mean Murray's somewhere else, likely in Dallas for 6 mil.
|
|
|
Post by Professor Berch on Dec 8, 2015 14:26:18 GMT -5
DeMarco just isn't what Chip Kelly wants in a runner. What Chip wants is someone who can run east/west, and DeMarco isn't comfortable with that. I feel like, after the season, we'll trade him for something. My brother seems to think he has no value, but he is still one of the better runners. We could get something for him. But what we need is Mathews as the #1, DeMarco as the #2 and Sproles as #3. Would you have still done the LeSean McCoy for Kiko Alonso deal, looking back? Then if you kept McCoy, that would obviously mean Murray's somewhere else, likely in Dallas for 6 mil. Hindsight 20/20, trade Shady for Kiko, sign Ryan Mathews, and have our 4 backs be Mathews, Sproles, Barner and Raheem Mostert. Dallas can have Murray, even with him, Dallas would be fucked this year without Romo.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2015 14:51:57 GMT -5
Would you have still done the LeSean McCoy for Kiko Alonso deal, looking back? Then if you kept McCoy, that would obviously mean Murray's somewhere else, likely in Dallas for 6 mil. Hindsight 20/20, trade Shady for Kiko, sign Ryan Mathews, and have our 4 backs be Mathews, Sproles, Barner and Raheem Mostert. Dallas can have Murray, even with him, Dallas would be fucked this year without Romo. Who is Raheem Mostert? ROFL
|
|